The red color of Mars is mere inches deep

When we look out at our planet Earth from space, we see that even our home world itself comes in a myriad of diverse colors. The sky itself is blue, as the atmosphere preferentially scatters shorter-wavelength blue light in all directions, giving our atmosphere it’s characteristic color. The oceans themselves are blue, as water molecules are better at absorbing longer-wavelength red light than they are blue light. Meanwhile, the continents appear brown or green, dependent on the vegetation (or lack thereof) growing there, while icecaps, glaciers, and clouds always appear white.

However, that diversity of colors is not common to all planets. For example, on our neighboring world, Mars, one color dominates: red. The ground is red: red everywhere. The lowlands are red; the highlands are red; the dried-up riverbeds are red; the sand dunes are red; it’s all red. The atmosphere itself is also red in every location we can measure it. The lone exception to “red” appears to be the Martian icecaps and clouds, which are white, albeit tinted with a reddish hue as observed from Earth. Yet quite surprisingly, the “redness” of Mars is incredibly shallow; if you dug just the tiniest bit beneath the surface, the redness vanishes. Here’s the scientific story behind just what makes the red planet so red.

Mars, along with its thin atmosphere, as photographed from the Viking orbiter in the 1970s. The bright red atmosphere is due to the presence of Martian dust in the atmosphere, and the composition of Mars rocks was first discovered by the Viking landers.

From space, there’s no denying the red appearance of Mars. For all of recorded history in a wide variety of languages, the redness of Mars has been its most prominent feature. Mangala, the Sanskrit word for Mars, is red. Har decher, its ancient name in Egyptian, literally means “red one.” And as we’ve progressed into the space age, photos that distinguish the surface from the atmosphere clearly show that the air above Mars itself has an intrinsically red color.

In Earth’s atmosphere, Rayleigh scattering dominates, casting blue light in all directions while the red light travels relatively undisturbed. However, the atmosphere of Mars is only 0.7% (or 1/140th) as thick as Earth’s, rendering Rayleigh scattering from the gas molecules in Mars’s atmosphere extremely ineffective; it only has a negligible effect. Instead, dust particles in the Martian atmosphere dominate in (likely) two ways:

• the dust possesses greater absorption properties at shorter optical wavelengths (400-600 nm) than at longer (600+ nm) wavelengths, removing some of the blue light,
• and larger dust particles (~3 microns and larger) scatter longer-wavelength light more efficiently than atmospheric gas particles scatter shorter-wavelength light from Rayleigh scattering, sending red light in all directions preferentially.

Compared to the irradiance received at Earth’s surface, the light received on Mars’s surface is severely suppressed in shorter (bluer) wavelengths. This is consistent with small hematite dust particles suspended in the Martian atmosphere, with the opacity increasing with increased dust density.

If you look at the suspended atmospheric dust in detail on Mars, and ask, “what is it like,” the answer is incredibly informative. Just from looking at its spectral properties — or “how it affects the light” — we can see that the dust is very similar to the regions on Mars that:

• are high in reflectivity,
• represent bright soil deposits,
• and are rich in iron: i.e., containing large amounts of ferric oxides.

When we looked at the dust in detail, and perhaps the most important details were revealed with the OMEGA instrument on ESA’s Mars Express mission, we found that the most common type of dust comes from nanocrystalline red hematite, which has the chemical formula α-Fe₂O₃. The particles that make up this hematite are small: between about 3 and 45 microns in diameter. That’s the right size and composition so that the rapid Martian winds, which typically blow at speeds close to ~100 km/hr, continuously sweep large amounts of dust up into the atmosphere, where it remains fairly well-mixed, even in the complete absence of any dust storms.

The same panoramic composite image, taken by Opportunity, shown with two different color assignments. Top image is in “true color,” as human eyes would see Mars, while the bottom is in false-color enhanced for color contrast.

When we look at the Martian surface itself, however, the story gets far more interesting. Ever since we began examining the Martian surface in detail — first from orbiting missions and, later, landers and rovers — we noticed that surface features on the red planet would change over time. In particular, we’d notice that the composition of the Martian surface could be subdivided into darker areas and brighter areas, and those divisions would change over time. In fact, based on our observations, we saw that the dark areas would evolve by following a particular pattern:

• they’d begin dark,
• they would get covered in dust that we suspect originated from the brighter areas, causing them to become brighter themselves,
• and then it’s like the “bright” parts would fade away, as they would go back to being dark once again.

For a long time, we didn’t know why these changes would occur, or what processes would drive these observable changes. After a while, however, we started noticing that the dark areas that change all had a few things in common, particularly when compared to the dark areas that didn’t change. The big difference was this: the dark areas that changed over time had relatively lower elevations, smaller slopes, and were surrounded by brighter areas. By contrast, the higher-elevation, steeper-sloped, and very large dark areas didn’t change in this way over time.

On Mars, bare-rock structures hold onto heat far better than sand-like structures do, meaning they will appear brighter at night, when viewed in the infrared. A variety of rock types and colors can be seen, as dust clings to some surfaces much better than others. From up close, it’s very clear that Mars is not a uniform planet.

It was back in 1967 that a duo of scientists — one of whom just happened to be Carl Sagan — who figured out the solution: Mars is covered with a layer of this thin, sandy dust that’s driven by winds all across the Martian surface. This sand gets blown from area to area, but it’s easierfor that dust to:

• travel short distances as compared to long distances,
• travel either from higher to lower elevations or between areas of comparable elevations, rather than from lower elevations up to much higher elevations,
• and to get blown away from (or off of) areas possessing steeper slopes, as opposed to areas possessing shallower slopes.

In other words, the red dust that dominates the color palette of Mars must only be skin deep. That’s not even a poetic turn of phrase in this case: most of Mars is covered by a layer of dust that’s only a few centimeters, or even just a few millimeters, thick! Even in the region where the dust is thickest — the large plateau known as the Tharsis region, consisting of three very large volcanoes just offset from Olympus Mons (which appears to the plateau’s northwest) — it’s estimated to be a meager 2 meters (~7 feet) thick.

Data from the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) results in the production of this colorized topographic map of the western hemisphere of Mars, showing the Tharsis and Valles Marineris regions. The impact basin Argyre is at lower right, with the lowland Chryse Planitia to the right (east) of the Tharsis region. The plateau of the Tharsis region is the one region of Mars where the surface dust is observed to be thickest.

You might look at these facts, then, and wonder the following: do we have both a topographic map of Mars and also a map of the ferric oxides on Mars, and do these maps correlate with one another in any way?

It’s a smart thought, and one that we’ll get to in just a second, but first there’s something important to recognize: “ferric oxide” doesn’t necessarily mean “red Mars dust” the way you might naively think. First off, ferric oxides are present everywhere on the red planet, including:

• within the crust,
• found in lava outflows,
• and in the Martian dust that’s been exposed to oxidation reactions with the atmosphere.

Given that the atmosphere, even today, contains significant quantities of both carbon dioxide and water (both of which can be photoionized), there’s a readily available source of oxygen, capable of oxidizing any iron-rich material that makes it to the surface: where it contacts the atmosphere.

As a result, when we look at a ferric oxide map of Mars — again, made by the fabulous OMEGA instrument aboard ESA’s Mars Express — we find that yes, the ferric oxides are everywhere, but the abundances are highest across the northern and mid-latitudes, and lowest across the southern latitudes.

This map, by the OMEGA instrument on ESA’s Mars Express, plots the distribution of ferric oxides, a mineral phase of iron, across the surface of Mars. Ferric oxides (an oxide of iron) are present everywhere on the planet: within the bulk crust, lava outflows and the dust oxidized by chemical reactions with the Martian atmosphere. Bluer colors represent lower abundances of ferric oxide; redder colors represent higher such abundances.

On the other hand, the topography of Mars shows that the elevation of the red planet varies in an interesting way across its surface, and in a way that’s only partially correlated with the abundance of ferric oxides. The southern hemisphere, predominantly, is at a much higher elevation than the lowlands in the north. The greatest elevations occur in the ferric oxide-rich Tharsis region, but in the lowlands to the east of it, the abundances of ferric oxides plummets. This is likely due to an ancient collision early on in Mars’s history: a collision that not only may have given rise to Mars’s two extant moons, Phobos and Deimos, but a third, larger, innermore moon that likely fell back onto Mars billions of years ago.

What you have to realize is that the red hematite (Fe₂O₃) form of ferric oxide, which is possibly the primary culprit for the “redness” of Mars, isn’t the only form of ferric oxide. There is also magnetite: Fe₃O₄, which is black in color instead of red. Although the global topography of Mars appears to play a role in the abundances of ferric oxide, it clearly isn’t the only factor at play, and might not even be the primary factor in determining Mars’s color.

The Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) instrument, part of Mars Global Surveyor, collected over 200 million laser altimeter measurements in constructing this topographic map of Mars. The Tharsis region, at center-left, is the highest elevation region on the planet, while the lowlands appear in blue. Note the much lower elevation of the northern hemisphere compared to the southern.

What we think is occurring — and this has been a consistent picture for many years — is that there is a bright, globally distributed, globally homogeneous set of dust that gets swept up into the atmosphere and remains there. That dust is basically suspended in the thin Martian atmosphere, and although events like dust storms can increase the concentration, it never drops to a negligibly low value. Mars’s atmosphere is always rich with this dust, and that dust then provides the atmosphere’s relatively uniform color, but then we have to reckon with the fact that the color features of Mars’s surface aren’t uniform at all.

The “settling of atmospheric dust” is only one factor in determining the surface color of various regions of Mars. This is something we’ve learned very well from our landers and rovers: Mars doesn’t possess a uniform red color at all. In fact, the surface itself is more of an orangey shade of butterscotch overall, and then an examination of various rocky objects and deposits on the surface appear to have a variety of colors: brown, golden, tan, and even greenish or yellow, in addition to the common oranges and reds. The primary factor in determining the color of a Mars rock simply depends on what minerals make up those deposits.

This image, taken by Mars Pathfinder of its Sojourner rover, shows a variety of colors. The rover’s wheels are reddish due to the Martian hematite; the disturbed soil is much darker underneath. Rocks of a variety of intrinsic colors can be seen, but also the role that the sunlight’s angle plays can be clearly seen as well.

One question that’s still under investigation is the exact mechanism by which these red hematite particles form. Although there are many ideas that involve molecular oxygen, it’s only found in tiny, trace amounts from the photodissociation of water. Reactions involving water or high temperatures are possible, but those are thermodynamically disfavored.

One set of favored possibilities are reactions involving hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), which occurs naturally on Mars in low abundances, but behaves as a very strong oxidant. The fact that we see large amounts of α-Fe₂O₃, but no hydrated ferric iron minerals (indicating a lack of water, or plain old H₂O), could be an indication of this pathway.

Alternatively, we might obtain this red hematite simply from a purely physical process: erosion. If you mix together magnetite powder, quartz sand, and quartz dust together and tumble it in a flask, some of the magnetite converts to hematite. In particular, a “black” mixture (dominated by magnetite) will appear red, as the quartz gets fractured, exposing oxygen atoms, which attach to the broken magnetite bonds, forming hematite. Perhaps the notion of “water is responsible for ferric oxides” is a literal red herring after all.

The start of the 2018 dust storm that led to the demise of NASA’s Opportunity rover. Even from this coarse map, it’s clear that the dust is red in color, and severely reddens the atmosphere as greater proportions of dust become suspended in the Martian atmosphere.

So, all in all, Mars is red because of hematite, which is a red form of ferric oxide. Although ferric oxides are found in many places, only the hematite is largely responsible for the red color, and the small dust particles that are suspended in the atmosphere and that coat the top few millimeters-to-meters of Mars’s surface are wholly responsible for the red color we see.

If we could somehow calm the atmosphere for extremely long periods of time and allowed all of the Martian dust within it to settle out, you might expect that Rayleigh scattering would dominate like it does on Earth, turning the skies blue. This is only partly correct, though; because the Martian atmosphere is so thin and tenuous, the sky would appear very dark: almost completely black, with just a very slight bluish tint to it. If you could successfully block out the brightness coming from the planet’s surface, you would likely be able to see some stars and up to six planets — Mercury, Venus, Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, and sometimes Uranus — possibly even during the daytime.

Mars might be the red planet, but only a tiny, minuscule amount of Mars, overall is actually red. Fortunately for us, that red part is the outermost layer of its surface, has been swept up to be pervasive in the Martian atmosphere, and, from an external perspective, turns the entire planet red. This tiny amount of material, remarkably, is what accounts for the red-colored planet we actually perceive.

This article was originally published in March of 2021. It was updated in 2025.